Skip to content

Surveillance-tech report: Prospect

Mentions current to 27 September 2026

This report covers meetings processed up to 2026-09-27. Anything newer shows up first in This Week in Surveillance.

Want to do something about it?

Visit flockoff.io to find out what you can do.

At a glance: Prospect

345 licence-plate searches by Prospect police in six towns' released Flock logs

345licence-plate searchesby Prospect police, in six towns' released Flock logs · open the dashboard

Meetings not available yet: we have not found Prospect's meeting recordings in a form we can use -- they may not be published online, or only behind a login or password. If you know where they are, or can help us get access, use the Questions? Feedback? button on any page (or the feedback page) to reach out and work with us to get Prospect into the system.

This report collects every mention of surveillance technology in Prospect's public record that this project can read -- its recorded meetings once they are transcribed, its published agendas and minutes, and its police department's licence-plate search log where one has been released.

Contents

Licence-plate searches by Prospect police

Six Connecticut towns have released the Flock audit log of every search run against their cameras. Below is what that record holds for Prospect's own police department -- not a finding, just the log.

Prospect CT PD

  • 345 searches between 2025-03 and 2026-06 (15 months with at least one search)
  • 349 camera networks swept by the average single search
  • 97% of them reached beyond Prospect's own cameras
  • The commonest stated reason is free text or a numeric code, rather than one of the preset categories Flock introduced in December 2025

Open Prospect CT PD's search dashboard -- every one of those searches, filterable by month, stated reason, search type and how far it reached, with a How to read this tab covering what each field means and what the record cannot tell you.

A floor, not a total. The record only sees queries that reached those six towns' cameras. A single Flock query typically sweeps thousands of networks at once, so most of a Connecticut department's searching does land in it -- but the real count is higher. Nothing in it names an officer, shows a plate, or records what any search returned.

Mentions by topic: first seen / most recent

Back to the meetings. Everything above this point was about licence-plate searches -- what the town's police looked up. Everything below is about what was said: each mention is a moment in a recorded public meeting where a surveillance technology came up, with a link to that moment in the video.

No surveillance-technology mentions found in this town's transcribed meetings yet.

Timeline

No meetings have surfaced a finding yet.

Findings by topic

ai_data_fusion

(no findings)

alpr

(no findings)

biometrics_other

(no findings)

body_camera

(no findings)

cad

(no findings)

cell_site_sim

(no findings)

data_broker

(no findings)

doorbell_partnership

(no findings)

drone

(no findings)

facial_recognition

(no findings)

gunshot_detection

(no findings)

mobile_forensics

(no findings)

osint_social_monitor

(no findings)

predictive_policing

(no findings)

purchasing_broker

(no findings)

rtcc

(no findings)

surveillance_general

(no findings)

undercover_tools

(no findings)

vehicle_forensics

(no findings)

video_analytics

(no findings)

Agenda/minutes mentions (unreviewed -- live keyword scan, no human review queue yet)

ai_data_fusion

(no mentions)

alpr

(no mentions)

biometrics_other

(no mentions)

body_camera

(no mentions)

cad

(no mentions)

cell_site_sim

(no mentions)

data_broker

(no mentions)

doorbell_partnership

(no mentions)

drone

(no mentions)

facial_recognition

(no mentions)

gunshot_detection

(no mentions)

mobile_forensics

(no mentions)

osint_social_monitor

(no mentions)

predictive_policing

(no mentions)

purchasing_broker

(no mentions)

rtcc

(no mentions)

surveillance_general

(no mentions)

undercover_tools

(no mentions)

vehicle_forensics

(no mentions)

video_analytics

(no mentions)

How this report was built

Everything below describes the corpus and its limits, rather than what was found in it.

Coverage status

  • Channels registered: 0
  • Active meeting bodies: 0
  • Videos registered: 0 (fetched: 0, no captions: 0)
  • Date range covered: no video in this corpus has a parseable upload date, so no range can be stated

Channels

(none)

Tab crawl history

(none)

Registered meeting bodies

(none)

Agenda/minutes coverage

  • Agenda sources registered: 1
  • Documents registered: 0 (fetched: 0)
  • Date range covered: no agenda document on file carries a parseable date yet

Agenda sources

source_id platform base_url status
prospect_custom custom https://townofprospect.gov/agendas-minutes/ unconfirmed

Research log

logged_at field_name new_value source by
2026-08-27 07:45:00.003032 channel_not_found No viable YouTube channel found -- two real near-miss collisions caught and rejected via yt-dlp verification: "City of Prospect Meetings" is explicitly Prospect, KENTUCKY (per its own channel description), and a bare "Prospect" channel is a movie-trailer fan channel for the 2018 film "Prospect", not a government channel. townofprospect.gov itself has no mention of YouTube/public-access-TV/video streaming anywhere. WebSearch (multiple queries) + yt-dlp verification of both candidate channels + WebFetch of townofprospect.gov, 2026-08-27 claude

Gaps and caveats

Videos with no captions available (0 shown, max 25)

(none)

Tabs never crawled

(none)

Get the full transcripts

Prospect has 0 transcripts so far -- too few to publish as an archive yet. It will appear here once the corpus grows.

Generated 2026-09-27T16:34:49 from Prospect's meeting transcripts and agenda documents. Home addresses spoken during public comment are redacted; see the archive MANIFEST for what that means.

Questions? Feedback?